Elections of 2016 of America. Is there but 2 choices?

 

Elections of 2016 of America.

 Seek to vote for those local, county, state people you desire to be your employee's. who shall follow theUS Consitition, be they in your school boards, up to your governors. On the national level, choose the best who has the opportunity to win, and who shall be closest to the Constitition.
               
Once again the best most quailfied and most honorable and Son of Liberty is NOT running at this time for US President, nor are most in the Congress (Senate/House) even remotely qualified to be called a Son / Daughter of Liberty.

 We face a darkening time, the marxists progressives and democracy teachers have had 60 yrs to create, reeducate and gain UnConstititional Powers and Controls over your very breath of life. Your water, lands, food, homes, jobs are at their control and if they so desire they can by use of what they term laws, beurocracy, rules... take all you have even your Liberty, even your life.

 Now, see you the dangers we are in?
Awaken have you yet?
Asleep you are still, most in these lands.
I do not follow the rhetoric of lesser of 2 evils...
What is to be done?
The massive corruption, treason, secret combinations, massive conspiracies DO exist in these lands. Powerful they are.
Stage 4.9 brain cancer is where America stands at this moment.

Only major actions, surgery will even have a glimmer of hope to reverse the course we are now set upon.

The majority shall not take these actions, sadly. For what ever reasons they be.

 I see the Presidential election as this,

 Since the most qualified Cruz no longer available due to the above mentioned wickedness.
You have an option.

Trump, comes with both good and ill history, but with one that he has shown he can make mistakes and improve, a willingness to become better.
No he is not perfect, no one is, No I do not fully trust him.
He may be able to learn more about the Constitution and the Republic as the years go by, and become a better man, possibly a better President.
I see he does care for people, and this Nation.

Clinton, is a proven follower of all that is evil and wicked in the world, her master seems to be Lucifer for her life's actions show this.
She will do all in her power to stay in office, to gain more glory for her self and power and desires to control you as your King.
It would take volumes of books to show all her darkness and yet it shall not tell the whole tale.
One of these 2 will become your next President of America folks.

Which one do you feel will be better for our future?

 Clinton will be an evil tyrant, completely eliminating any residue of the Constitution, Patriot's, Liberty and Sovernty of America.
You will become as the peoples under Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Hitler, Mussolini and many others became, slaves to their wickedness and great evil, all of these have one thing in common, their master of darkness, Lucifer the fallen one.

Trump, who is weak in many area's, will place around him the strongest advisors in all area's to help make America a better place, more secure, and will try to avoid WW 3 which is nigh at hand due to the Obama / Clinton doings.

Again I do not fully trust Trump, however he is the better of these choices.

 You the People of America have allowed your choices to be these 2 people.
Those you put in positions of power choose them.
If you don't like these choices have you held those in power responsible for their poor choices they have given you?

Your media tells so many lies you cannot know what is true or false, for they have their agenda's, their pay masters whom they follow.

 Truth no longer matters in the Press / Media of America, and its been this way a long time.

The more I think on this, the more I feel a need to vote for Trump.

 In order to do what I can to delay America's Death.

 To vote for Clinton or anyone who shall by loss of votes allow Clinton to become our Tyrant in DC, is not negotiable at this time.

The lands of America are ripening in iniquity, and unless as a nation it returns to God and repents as a nation, it shall as history has shown, be humbled by God by many means.

 Thus Trump may give you a few more years to prepare for the inevitable, to save some money, get out of debt, save food and water and provisions so you can live / survive the coming doom upon these lands.

 If Trump will give us a few more years of just that ability then I feel he is worth electing.
Clinton will drop the Iron hammer of tyranny asap.

So with the hope of a few more years to prepare, for America to return to God and repent as individuals before him.


 Then I shall for that reasoning vote for him.

These are my thoughts, could Trump become a tyrant its a possibility,
Will Clinton become a tyrant its a surety. Guaranteed.

Is the God of these lands the Only King and true leader of this great land of North America, a promised land to my ancestors long ago who he guided here and protected as long as they remembered to serve him.

 Thus I shall follow my thinking on these things, be I right or wrong.
History shall tell the tale of our days.

The important thing America, is you have time to prepare, to remember who God is, to Discover who God is, to embrace who God is.

 I know Jesus Christ is the One True God, of these lands and this Earth for he is the Great Creator of all things

Prepare to meet him, for be it sooner or later it mattereth not, we shall all one day stand before him, to be judged for what he have or have not done during this our mortal life.

 Prepare well.
Prepare quickly.
God Speed.

 May we all choose wisely.

S.T.Huls

 

The Persecution of the Bundy Good Guys Lew Rockwell. more insight into the Feds Kangaroo systems

 

Kelli Stewart

4 hrs ·

Bundy Prosecutors Admit That Undercover Informants Outnumbered Defendants In Recent Trial
By Roger I. Roots, J.D., Ph.D.

 October 24, 2016
For the past six weeks Oregonians have been treated to a political trial of the “Malheur 7” (Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Shawna Cox, Jeff Banta, David Fry, Neal Wampler and Ken Medenbach,). I was privileged to have a ringside seat at the trial as a volunteer researcher and paralegal for Ryan Bundy (who represents himself) at the trial.
As I write these words, the jury is out, considering whether the defendants conspired to prevent U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service or Bureau of Land Management officers from performing their duties at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in rural eastern Oregon. The Bundy brothers and other defendants are alleged to have participated in an “armed standoff” occupation of the Refuge during January 2016 (while protesting the unconstitutional occupation by the federal government itself over the Refuge and other public lands).
The trial has revealed an astounding brave new world of modern surveillance and surreptitious “law enforcement” techniques. Drones flew over and recorded much of what went on. FBI agents captured and monitored every phone number connected between every participant. A search warrant after the fact gave the government permission to surf through 36 Laptops, smartphones, flash drives and other devices to build the government’s case. The FBI turned the analysis of Facebook likes, dislikes, messages, and posts into a science, with multiple agents assigned to that social media alone.
Outside the Refuge, FBI, Oregon State Police, and other law enforcement agencies swarmed over the countryside. 
Government snipers appeared on local rooftops. 
Barricades and barbed wire were erected to protect the school and courthouse from the alleged militia danger. 
Undercover FBI agents dressed as redneck militia members roamed through local stores and menaced the streets.
Money was spent at such an extravagant pace that one professional auditor told me that the dollar amounts should have themselves triggered a separate criminal investigation. 
The Feds have publicly claimed that the 41-day occupation caused at least “$6.9 million” in damages. 
At trial, prosecutors objected, however, to every request to examine such claims. “Irrelevant!” said the prosecution. (In the event that any defendants are convicted, the Justice Department will surely assert such dollar claims in a demand for ‘restitution.’)

And there were undercover government informants. Everywhere. 
 Suspicions that the government’s narrative was largely erected with undercover agents were borne out during the first week of trial.  
It was revealed by an Oregon State trooper that one of Ammon Bundy’s “bodyguards”—a man who drove him to his arrest—was an undercover informant.

Another informant (“Mama Bear”) was revealed when a defense lawyer subpoenaed her for the defense. The woman admitted that her entire trip to the Malheur Refuge was funded by the San Diego FBI office and that she was paid thousands of dollars to inform on the occupiers while helping out in the kitchen.

Each of these informants were revealed by accident. 
Federal prosecutors vociferously refused to provide the names of other informants—citing case law that holds such revelations may put informants in danger. 
 Prosecutors even used secret information—not provided to the defense—to cross-examine “Mama Bear,” to the prejudice of the defendants.

For days, Marcus Mumford (attorney for Ammon Bundy) demanded more information about the extent of undercover informants. 
 Mumford pointed to the fact that the defendants were charged with conspiracy, and no one can be convicted of conspiring with undercover government agents. 
(The trial was filled with unanswered questions about who brought and left ammunition and guns, who damaged property, and why some people but not others were charged.)

Finally the Justice Department stipulated (without naming any names) that at least nine occupiers were undercover informants; a number greater than the number of defendants on trial. 
 (Heavily redacted documents in the hands of the defense suggest the number of informants was actually at least 15.)

Significantly, the prosecution’s most damning evidence collapsed at the end of the trial when it was revealed that the man who ran a militia shooting range at the Malheur Refuge was himself an undercover agent. 
Through the hard work of defense lawyers, “John Killman” was identified as a paid (“reimbursed,” he said) informant who traveled to the occupation at the behest of the government in a beat-up pickup truck to lead the occupiers in combat “safety” training. “Killman” had even trained defendant Jeff Banta to stop cars and pull out their drivers at gunpoint. 
    
Stay tuned!

The Best of Roger I. Roots, J.D., Ph.D.
Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare
 Roger Roots, J.D., Ph.D. [send him mail] is attorney, sociologist, and a member of the advisory board of the Fully Informed Jury Association. He is author of The Conviction Factory: The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts.

H/t Carol Bundy
source:

The Persecution of the Bundy Good Guys - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

For the past six weeks Oregonians have been treated to a political trial of the “Malheur 7” (Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Shawna Cox, Jeff Banta, David Fry, Neal Wampler and Ken Medenbach,).  I was privileged to have a ringside seat at the trial as a volunteer researcher and paralegal for Ryan Bundy

Judge Anna J. Brown’s War on the Constitution by April Kiessling, Feds Rigged Oregon Courts

Judge Anna J. Brown’s War on the Constitution

Brown’s delusions of grandeur in her little Federal fiefdom are growing as this case waxes on.

October 22, 2016 Constitution, DHS, DOJ, Oregon 0

 

Judge Anna J. Brown’s War on the Constitution

By: April Kiessling

Defendants in Oregon’s Malheur Refuge Occupation case have been imprisoned and charged with a multitude of high crimes and misdemeanors by federal and state agents. As the wheels of justice slowly grind, they find their most formidable foe may not be the FBI, embedded informants or a biased press – but their judge.

Anna J. Brown is a US District judge in the state of Oregon, appointed by Bill Clinton. She was sent to supervise the mass trial of virtually all the Malheur Refuge Occupation defendants (originally 26). Seven are currently being tried as a group. It quickly became clear why she was chosen, as well as given a great deal of latitude and scope of power. Brown appears to been exhibiting an extreme bias against the defendants and an almost slobbering largess toward the prosecution. So open is her bias, that virtually every observer is aware of it by now.
Possibly the most egregious of Brown’s many instances of injustice is her micromanagement and hostility during defense testimony. She is continuously speaking, leading, countering, cutting, and blocking the defense. One observer told me she had counted 89 objections from the prosecution (interrupting Ammon Bundy’s testimony) in only one morning session. “Brown sustained [allowed] all of them but eight” she marveled. Conversely, defense attorneys rarely objected. When they did, they were generally ignored, while the prosecution continued merrily along.

Constitution Taboo

The US Constitution is taboo in Judge Anna J. Brown’s courtroom. Even sidewalks surrounding the federal building where people are threatened with arrest for passing out copies. It seems to cause hysterical reactions. The jurist flat-out blocked any portion of the Constitution to be read or recited on several occasions, which brought audible gasps of disbelief from the gallery. Even reference to the Constitution, as well mentioning specific Oregon laws (which defendants are charged with breaking), is discouraged.
Brown orders them to consider all references to the document solely as a matter of the “state of mind” of the defendants, as if it inspired criminal acts. Inference that the defendants share mental problems stemming from belief in the powers of the Constitution, comes across loud and clear. Since many of the defendants base their actions and motivations on the Constitution, their defense is effectively knocked out at first base.

Clockwise, from left: Ammon Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Shawna Cox, Jeff Wayne Banta, Neil Wampler, David Lee Fry, Kenneth Mendenbach. Seven defendants currently being tried in Brown’s courtroom.

But Brown doesn’t stop her censorship with only the Constitution. Malheur defendants are denied everything from witnesses to time. The lengthy prosecution case against them went on without a hitch and no complaints from Anna J. Brown. Now the judge is in a rush, reminding Ammon Bundy’s lawyers Marcus Mumford and J. Morgan Philpot, of all the time their client wastes while they attempt to put up a defense. Bundy has been charged with numerous crimes and would be expected to address them all.
Some witnesses for the defense fared better than others. The Rev. Franklin Graham (son of Billy Graham) took the stand to testify for the defendants on September 29, 2016. He wasn’t interrupted or threatened, undoubtedly due to his celebrity status. Graham praised the non-violent nature of the last remaining four occupiers at the Refuge and convinced them to leave. The evangelist also described defendants’ terror and his personal fears for their safety at the hands of the government.

Un- Constitutional Political Manuvering

Political machinations were evident early on. On July 15, 2016, months before the actual trial, Brown ruled that Ammon Bundy and the others were not allowed to discuss any number of things that occurred, before, after, or during the occupation. Specifically, they denied pretrial evidence of FBI agents who had [falsely] claimed to be militia with the occupation. Caught in the act of ratcheting up conflict and fear in Burns, Oregon, the FBI was instrumental and possibly took the lead in killing spokesman LaVoy Finicum. It is reported that the DOJ is currently investigating this. The apparent murder of LaVoy Finicum at what is euphemistically labeled a “traffic stop” is the other forbidden subject in Brown’s court. His name alone sends prosecutors into reactionary objections. On September, 23, 2016, Brown threatened Mumford with $1000 fines and “contempt of court” citations for each mention of LaVoy, including testimony on the government informant driving Ammon Bundy’s car during the fatal ambush.

LaVoy, An ‘Off Limits’ Subject

Brown insists LaVoy’s death is not “related to the refuge occupation” although his actions there are clearly the reason he is dead. Also, FBI malfeasance is a reasonable defense for several defendants, who claim they remained at Malheur for fear of being gunned down. As occupation spokesman, LaVoy was present in several scenarios of which defendants are required to testify, but are hamstrung by inability to refer to him by name. Brown’s arbitrary restrictions are especially onerous, since prosecution made it clear that “intention” of occupiers is central to whether they are considered to have committed crimes.
Since then, Brown routinely changes rules and instructions to the jury, mid-stream. Mumford challenged her jury instructions to disregard his objections over tagging defendants “terrorists.” This was in discussion over the imprisoned Oregon ranch family, the Hammonds, who are being charged under the “Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.” Early on, the Malheur group were labeled “militia” or “terrorists” in legal communications and by much of the press. None of this has been substantiated. Some Malheur occupiers/visitors were unarmed and others are even members of religions believing in pacifism. Defendants are “using the term [terrorist] improperly,” Brown instructed, as she is apparently an authority on linguistics.

Attys. J. Morgan Philpot & Marcus Mumford represent Ammon Bundy.

Questioning the Bench a Threat?

At this point Mumford charged the court with “taking sides” and accused Brown with not allowing him to present evidence. Perhaps running out of rationalizations, Brown claimed to then be “threatened” by Mumford, as she apparently interprets questions over legal matters as menacing.
Government is allowed to enter all exhibits, data, video or witnesses, from any place, any source or time. Defendants are given no such latitude. Brown denied them discussing the killing of their spokesman LaVoy, because it didn’t happen on Refuge grounds, but a few miles down the road. Attorney Mumford risks the rage of Brown as he obliquely slips his points into questions, such as how close police were when they “shot Finicum three times in the back” on January, 26, 2016.
Restrictions on defense access to prosecution evidence in discovery and later was so extreme that Ammon Bundy’s original lawyer, Mike Arnold, resorted to crowd sourcing and social media appeals to gain the evidence refused him in court. This only led to censoring by the Oregon State Bar and his resignation from the case.
Presenting defendants as rational actors is paramount to defense because occupiers and supporters are portrayed as terrorists and right-wing zealots. But they have friends in high places. Donald Trump wrote a scathing opinion piece in the Reno Gazette Journal during the occupation in January, 26, 2016. “How is it that we have a president. . .who encourages faceless, nameless bureaucrats to manage public lands as if the millions of acres were owned by agencies such as the Bureau of Land Management and the Department of Energy?” Trump asked. He also noted the “draconian rule of the BLM” in damaging local economies. All are subjects defendants are not allowed to bring up for various pretexts.

Defense was not allowed to play several videos. One was of Senator Harry Reid calling the original ranch protesters in Nevada “domestic terrorists” in 2014. Reid’s insult seems to have inspired the FBI and Homeland Security to become heavily involved in ranch and farm land disputes. They’ve also borrowed his terminology. Current Director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Neil Kornze was previously a Reid aide. He was appointed almost to the day that the original “Bunkerville” land dispute began in Nevada in April, 2014. Only a coincidence. Another banned video, backed defendant Jeff Banta’s declared purpose for his visit to the Refuge. The video was made in 2012 of BLM initiated fires in French Glen, Oregon (BLM is one of chief plaintiffs.) The BLM fires raged out of control, consuming farms, livestock and a home. For making controlled burns, ranchers are currently imprisoned with serious charges. This BLM policy and government prosecution since 1989 was one of the major motivations for the Malheur occupiers. Ironically BLM is lodging suits against the ranchers in civil court as well and have first claim privileges against their ranches. BLM signs are up on Bundy land at this time. The Hammonds previously sued and won cases against the BLM, and there is bad blood between the agency and many ranchers and farmers in Western states.
According to several defendants, their central purpose was to force court battles over the government’s procurement and property rights of the Malheur Refuge and other federal properties. Proximate cause of the occupation was the re-imprisonment of the Hammonds: Dwight (74) and son Steven (46). This came after they served time, had already released and for the same crime. Judge Brown barred defense lawyers from bringing up any questions over “who owns the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge” even as she instructed the jury seek to understand the “state of mind” and motivation of the seven current defendants.
Defense objected to the presence of FBI agent Ronnie Walker in the courtroom as an observer, although he was on the prosecution witness list. When this was brought up to Brown, she failed to remove him, although no other witnesses are allowed to watch court proceedings. This is a general rule from official US Department of Justice materials, but apparently not required in Judge Brown’s court.

Michele Fiore for the Defense

Michele Fiore, a defense witness for Malheur Refuge occupiers, is also a Nevada Assemblywoman

Michele Fiore, a defense witness and Nevada Assemblywoman, refused to be intimidated by Brown on October 6, 2016. Fiore visited the Refuge in January, 2016, as a representative of the Coalition of Western States (C.O.W.S.). Fiore claimed that she determined “through Oregon officials” that “no laws were being broken” at the Refuge. Brown berated Fiore, ordering her to “stop making statements before the jurors and interpreting law.” Although Fiore is a lawmaker and Brown is not, Fiore’s statements are only “her opinion” Brown insisted. The Assemblywoman made a dramatic turn when she defied Judge Brown and passionately spoke of the “murder of LaVoy Finicum.”
The farcical nature is almost comical, if not for the high stakes. A federal court is making a case their agencies may confiscate private land, deny speech and assembly, challenge gun rights, control local police, supplant state and county laws and terrorize people while imputing it to targeted groups. It’s a big deal with surprising little publicity, although it is picking up steam. Early on, there were surprisingly few observers at the trial and this is no accident either.
A remarkable small chamber was used for this titanic trial. Defendants are allowed only two seats each for family or supporters. The public gallery is tiny, requiring observers and media to queue up an hour or so in advance for a chance at a seat. A larger public overflow area is available via video, but even that is threatened with closure at times and it is apparent the state resents public observation.
In one of Judge Brown’s more monomaniacal declarations, the gallery folk forgot themselves and snickered after a sarcastic remark by Ammon Bundy. An agent ordered silence, warning the possible loss of viewing privileges. Brown declared her ire over such offenses as “page turning”, throat clearing or clicking pens. Yet Brown jokes around on the stand and not only allows the courtroom a chuckle, but appears to enjoy it.
Brown’s delusions of grandeur in her little Federal fiefdom are growing as this case waxes on. Sometimes she forgets there are witnesses and appears to be losing control. On Oct 4th, while defense questioned Chris Briels, Brown suddenly exclaimed “sustained.” But there had been no objections. Rather than recuse herself or allow a mistrial, Brown rationalized her erratic behaviour and continued her dogged work for the prosecution. “I’m not going to let the witness speculate” she insisted as an excuse. The sheer autocratic attitude of the woman and her aversion to civil rights is spectacular. Brown appears a perfect face of the contempt some of these Federal agencies have for the people they are prosecuting.
Ammon Bundy’s attorneys are seeking a postponement until there is a ruling on appeals over Brown’s inconsistencies, and asserted mistreatment of their client in jail. They claim Bundy is malnourished and not being allowed access to materials to prepare for his defense, such as the internet. Their requests have been disregarded, which are becoming a theme in this courtroom. The Judge Anna J. Brown show goes on.

SOURCES:
US District Court, Portland, OR. / Interviews with other observers and witnesses
Redoubt News http://redoubtnews.com/2016/10/07/brown-light-favorable-government/#comment-996
Reno Gazette-Journal http://www.rgj.com/story/opinion/voices/2016/01/07/trump-nevada-us-need-president-who-obeys-rule-law/78422530/
Scribd https://www.scribd.com/document/303457134/Superseding-indictment-in-United-States-v-Ammon-Bundy-et-al

Trumps Ten Point Plan and Contract with America

 

http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/at-gettysburg-trump-makes-closing-arguments-to-make-america-great-again-with-ten-point-plan

 

At Gettysburg, Trump Makes Closing Arguments To “Make America Great Again” With Ten-Point Plan

October 22, 2016 By Robert Gehl 232 Comments

 

It was the most somber and serious speech of his entire campaign.
With just 17 days to election day, Donald Trump appeared at Gettysburg for what appeared to be one last attempt to convince the American people to take a different path.
 
A path away from the establishment – that doesn’t work for ordinary Americans – and even worse, doesn’t care – and chart a new path or prosperity, security and success.
Starting his speech, Trump lamented the state of the American political system.
“We are a very divided nation,” he said, looking genuinely sad. “I am not a politician and never wanted to be a politician, but when I saw the trouble our country was in, I knew I couldn’t stand by and watch any longer. Our country has been so good to me, and I felt I had to act.
“I’ve seen the system up close and personal for many years. I’ve been a major part of it, I know how the game works in Washington and Wall Street. I know how the rules are rigged every day against Americans.”
One of the biggest problem, he said, is rampant voter fraud and the refusal of the media to recognize it, along with any poll that shows Trump ahead in the polls.

 

So to an enthusiastic crowd, Trump outlined his ten-point plan to “Make America Great Again.” He called it a contract between himself and the American people. Here are some of the acts he would implement within the first 100 days of his administration:

• Push a constitutional amendment for term limits for members of Congress.
• A hiring freeze on all federal employees to reduce federal workforce through attrition, exempting military public safety and public health.
• A permanent Ban on members of the Executive administration from ever becoming political lobbyists.
• Eliminating two federal regulations for every one passed.
• Repeal the “Obamacare Disaster” and provide relief to American families.
• Impose tough tariffs on foreign imports to keep American companies from moving overseas.
• Immediately open up energy production to jumpstart our economy.
• Appoint judges who will strictly uphold the Constitution.
• Immediately begin renegotiating NAFTA to make it a better deal.

Trump made a point of saying he would not approve the Time Warner-AT&T merger deal, arguing it would be too much consolidation in an already limited media market.
Trump also said he would cancel “every unconstitutional executive action, memorandum and order issued by Barack Obama, cancel funding for sanctuary cities, remove all of the more than 2 million criminal illegal immigrants from the country. “These are our drug dealers, gang heads, gang members, killers, and cancel visas to foreign countries that won’t take them back.”

Sharing some food for thought here folks.

There are dozens of such stories I have heard of over the entire USA and then there are Dreams, Visions if you desire to call them people have had over the last 100yrs, that speak of such actions.

Treason in DC and the White House is rampant, accepted, not challenged by those whose job is to do so. Pres. Obama in last few weeks told UN address that We the People of America Must accept a loss of liberty, encourages UN to do what this article speaks about.

Where this all ends, well.. that's up to you.

But great tribulations are and will unfold upon this land and the world and soon.

A word / warning to the United Nations Soldiers / Army who may see this.
Note: Most Americans are normal people like yourselves, God loving and helpful and just desire our Liberty and to live in peace.
If you come and invade our lands, with intent to enslave us on any level even with the permission of the Treasonous Leadership in DC / White House.

It will not matter, we do not hate you, but we shall honor the oaths of office sworn to protect these lands from domestic and foreign evils.
The US Constitution and God himself who inspired it grants us the rights, duty to protect and defend this land, our liberty, our wifes, children from the powers of darkness. Millions will do so.
Look up the US Constitution, study, read it and learn why America is a good land, we were once a Constitutional Republic, and desire to return to those days.
If you desire WAR in America then you just may find it, you will be isolated and then the people will rise like a tsunami of liberty, justice and come upon you. With the powers of Heaven that you cannot win against you shall face extermination.

Think long and hard, we do not desire your oppression, nor your extermination. We desire Peace.
God Bless the Republic and may common sense fill the minds of all in the UN.

     

United Nations Soldier Says They Will Soon Occupy America: “Going Door-to-Door Taking Guns Or Shooting To Kill”

By Mac Slavo on October 13, 2016 in News

The following excerpt is from an article that originally appeared on SHTF Plan

We have previously noted that recent allegations of Russian hacking could mean the Department of Homeland Security will be charged with protecting the Presidential election in November. In fact, as Joe Joseph noted in his latest daily news update, the Department of Defense and U.S. military may be joining DHS to ensure a fair electoral process. Coupled with previous reports that “independent” United Nations observers will be overseeing this year’s vote suggests there may be some legitimacy to the shocking claims you are about to read.
Consider what might happen should a particular candidate be elected to the Presidency, only to have the Department of Homeland Security, DoD or United Nations overturn the vote. And when we say “particular candidate” we are, of course, referring to Donald Trump. With well over 50 million Americans supporting him for the Presidency, if he were to win a decisive victory and then have that victory overturned because of national security issues, one can only imagine the outcry, protests and riots to follow.
The narrative has already been created at the very highest levels of America’s political hierarchy and it is not so hard to envision a scenario such as this playing out. 
Should such an event come to pass, would the “transition” be peaceful?
According to a recent alert posted at SteveQuayle.com, the United Nations may already be preparing for such an outcome:

This does not come from a high level source. Just an everyday average Joe. But a guy that works in the same industry, that always gave a hard time about the tin hat-stuff, recently returned from a Great Divide Concert at which a gentleman just passing by, stopped to mingle with this group of
people. They had a couple of drinks, and this guy states, he likes America, he likes the people. He wished he could dance like, the Americans. Laugh.
He states he had been fighting beside US troops over past 6-7 years. And this is why I feel I need to tell someone over here in the states a lil something. He said he was from Norway. And he would be back in 3-4 months as a part of UN troops. He said there was nothing he could do. But felt compelled that he needed to say something, just to let such good people know what is coming. He said that they were going to be going door to door taking guns, or shooting to kill. They already had the lists of names, and addresses.
I have no reason to not believe the words from acquaintance. It actually pretty much freaked him out. He is rather overwhelmed from the conversation.
From his reaction, and as long as we’ve been acquainted, I have no reason not to believe what he was told. I just wanted to pass this on to someone with the means to possibly get the word out.

One of our observant readers from Texas submitted a similar comment recently.
Via HCKS:

I just heard some really disturbing shit about something going on in Texas down here. I am sorry but I cannot post it. All I can say is that Chinese soldiers have been inching their way closer to all the major cities including Houston, Woodlands, Conroe, and other major cities and our state government knows that we will be under attack between now and the next 3-4 months. A chi-com soldier just threatened someone that I know very well recently and he is not happy about the incident. When chi-coms are telling Americans in my state where they can go from where they can’t go, then we have a BIG PHUCKING PROBLEM. All the military equipment is here in Texas, pre positioned during JADE HELM 15-16 and the soldiers have already been placed in our state and all they have to do is just go out, jump into the UN vehicles and roll out to the major highways, and deploy to neighborhoods. All over 2017 is when the civilians will be getting the worst of it. I know something is up because this link is matching up with what I am hearing.
The UN and Chinese know already in advance that they will be rolling down Hwy 45, Hwy 290, 1960/Hwy 6 from 45 north to deploy to take out these area of subdivision, and one of the biggest major attacks by the UN, and chi-coms will take place between 1960-hwy6-south down to Sugar land. They plan to do the same thing on the Katy Mason rd area, hwy10 area. Good luck when you get to that area.
…We have a very, very serious fucking situation on the horizon.

Now, on its face such claims may sound as if they are coming from the very fringes of the internet. And perhaps they are.
But before you dismiss these claims outright, keep in mind that it has been confirmed United Nations soldiers are actively involved in military training in the United States of America. Moreover, U.N. tank vehicles have been spotted  moving across U.S. highways. The United Nations has even tried to hide the fact that their soldiers and equipment have been deployed to the U.S. as evidenced by the following images showing how they are covering up the logos on their vehicles:

While it’s impossible to know exactly what the United Nations is planning in conjunction with sympathetic U.S. political leaders, we know for a fact that U.N troops are actively operating on our soil and their equipment is already here, laying dormant for whatever orders were to come down the pipeline.
If it turns out that the U.S. Presidential election next month is taken over by the Department of Homeland Security amid claims of a cyber attack on the electoral grid, and is then overturned in favor of Hillary Clinton, then it could well come to pass that United Nations ‘peace keepers’ are activated to quell any disturbance or dissent.
Related:
Homeland Security Could Steal What She Can’t Win: “Election Process Is Critical Infrastructure”
Texas Ranger Drops Jade Helm Bombshell: “There Are Trains With Shackles On Them”
UN Tank Vehicles Spotted Moving Across U.S.: “Peace Keepers and Potential for Civil Unrest”
Exposed: UN Vehicles Caught Trying To Hide Logo From Public View While Traveling Inside The United States
Where Is the Proof that UN Soldiers are Actively Operating on American Soil? Oh, Right Here…
Click here to Read this Entire Story on SHTF Plan

MICHELE FIORE - KEEPING HER WORD

Deb Jordan

9 hrs ·

MICHELE FIORE - KEEPING HER WORD
Michele Fiore on the Nevada Assembly Floor said this today in open session:
Good Morning,
...

I stand in support of and know that Blue Lives Matter; when we have Law Enforcement and County Sheriffs that support their citizens and Law Makers we need to support them too.
But there have been Sheriff's that hand their elected positions over to the Federal Government and some of the outcomes have been fatal.
Sheriff David Ward of Harney County Oregon did just that.
Under his watch a man "Lavoy Finicum" was murdered.
The Bureau Of Land Management (BLM) has become quite aggressive across our Nation; from continual harassment of our Indigenous Native Americans to our Rancher's, who are just trying to protect their livelihoods.
It's up to us to ensure our communities have the resources needed to protect it's citizens from Domestic Terrorist Agencies such as the BLM.
Most of my fellow friends in this Chamber were not at Bunkerville in April of 2014, but Sheriff Lombardo and Sheriff Douglas Gillespi were there.
Our Clark County Sheriffs stopped the Nevada Massacre the BLM had planned.
As the body camera footage from the BLM gets unsealed and released to the press and the public, the words I just spoke will be verified.
Thank you

What Really Happened in Oregon: Mysterious Deaths Surround #Oregonstandoff Occupie...

What Really Happened in Oregon: Mysterious Deaths Surround #Oregonstandoff Occupie...: SEE ALSO: - Salt Lake Tribune: Man who died inside burning Kanab building is son-in-law of Oregon standoff arrestee - Investment...