A Long Train of Abuses by Todd C. Engel - Patriot Political Prisoner of Obama, Sen Reid,

New post on It Matters How You Stand A Long Train of Abuses By Todd C. Engel by Doug Knowles “WE NEED Your HELP!” Todd Engel has written a letter “A Long Trail of Abuses” Please read the letter and then mail this letter to: President Trump 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20500 Attach a note or letter asking President Trump to issue a Full Presidential Pardon for Todd Engel. Also, please add Greg Burleson's name to the abuses. Todd has been sentenced to 14 years and Greg to 68 years in prison for simply showing up to prevent the massacre of the entire Bundy family. They exercised their 1st and 2nd amendment rights and were ultimately convicted of charges wrongfully, due to Judge Navarro suppressing the majority of the evidence and their entire defenses. They were then sentenced, not to the charges convicted, but to all the counts in which they were accused of in a false indictment. This is unjust and simply evil. You ask, "what can we do?" Well, this is what we can do! We can flood the President with letters. Have your entire family send separate letters if you feel inclined. With enough letters, someone will notice. We need to appeal to our President! He has to hear us. Our cries are falling on deaf ears in Nevada but we must keep trying. I myself will never accept these two angels, Todd and Greg, spending the rest of their lives in prison for ensuring our family's safety and protecting our rights. Thank You and please pray for these men and for this nation. God Bless you all and may He keep this land free through the work and sacrifice of good men and women. A Long Train of Abuses By Todd C. Engel IT MATTERS HOW YOU STAND·TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 On April 5, 2014, the Bureau of Land Management commenced an operation to impound rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle. In the run-up to the operation, no less than five separate threat assessments were conducted to ascertain the threat that the Bundy’s may pose to law enforcement officers during the roundup. Each and every one of the assessments conducted by the FBI, JTTF, BLM, et.al., showed that the Bundy’s propensity for violence to be virtually nonexistent. With these findings, an appropriate course of action pertaining to a law enforcement presence should have been a few Las Vegas Metro PD officers on scene ensuring the safety of all involved. If that had been the case, the impoundment would likely have been completed without incident. Nevertheless, that would not be the case. The BLM brought in Special Agent in Charge (SAC), Daniel P. Love, who began to stage a small army at his incident command post in the week leading up to the scheduled impoundment. The list of men and material he brought in included: ·         At least 138 heavily armed agents with level IV body armor, Kevlar helmets and assault rifles. ·         Two FBI Swat Teams, one from Los Angeles, and one from Las Vegas with attached sniper teams and a F.L.I.R. equipped helicopter. ·         A U.S. Park Service Special Event Tactical Team (SETT) with an attached sniper team. • Multiple BLM sniper teams ·         A Mine Resistant Armor Protected (MRAP) vehicle ·         Drones and Airplanes ·         Multiple German Shepherd attack dogs The BLM also set up two “First Amendment Areas” miles away from the impoundment operation for protesters to exercise their 1st Amendment rights. These areas were monitored by cameras and under cover agents who documented the license plates of people in the area. On April 6th, the second day of the gather, agents encountered civilians taking pictures of the gather from the side of the road. For over an hour, BLM agents harass these citizens and attempt to herd them into the “First Amendment Areas.” They threaten them with citations and arrest until they are informed by the United States Attorney’s Office that they have “no arrest authority.” Just a few short hours later, Dave Bundy is parked on the side of the road filming the gather with his Ipad. A BLM sniper team is deployed on the hill behind him and aim rifles at his back. Agents then approach him, body slam him, grind his face into the gravel and haul him off to jail, all with “no arrest authority.” He is released the next morning with no charges. His Ipad is confiscated and when it is returned, three years later, all video had been erased. As the impoundment continued, BLM agents began to shoot the Bundy’s cattle from helicopters, leaving many valuable bulls dead. They also systematically shot cattle they had corralled at the ICP and bury them in a mass grave. Simultaneously, the BLM and their contractors began to destroy Cliven Bundy’s State of Nevada deeded ‘waters’ that have been in his family for over a hundred years and are protected by Nevada State Law. It’s understandable why they wanted no pictures taken. Killing his cattle and destroying his waters are crimes under Nevada law. April 9th, a spontaneous protest occurs whereby citizens were curious as to why a dump truck and backhoe are involved in gathering cattle. As the protestors attempt to look into the back of the dump truck, an attack dog is released on Ammon Bundy and he is tased three times. His fifty-nine year old aunt is grabbed from behind and violently body slammed to the ground. In the dump truck, they find torched pieces of their water tanks, evidence of BLM criminal activity. When SAC Dan Love is asked by reporter Pete Santilli, if the government is killing cattle, Dan Love states, “we are not killing cattle!” Multiple videos and photographs show different. (All of the information listed above was not allowed to be presented at my trial) On April 12th, a tense protest occurs with armed and unarmed citizens in a wash a few miles from the Bundy residence. As unarmed protestors arrived in the wash, the BLM immediately aimed assault rifles at them and stated over the loudspeaker that they would use lethal force. This precipitated a response from armed protesters who moved down the freeway towards the wash to defend the people from the BLM. During this protest, multiple agents are recorded saying such things as: “This is another Waco,” “This is a shoot first ask questions later type situation,” and after the protest is over, an agent says, “ Not one shot fired. They’re all fucking mouth. We should have ran units in there, smashed em and killed em.” Almost two years after the impoundment, nineteen of us would be arrested and put on trial in three separate tiers. The first tier went to trial on February 6th, 2017, of which I would be included in. Just six weeks before trial, due to my court appointed attorney being incompetent and unprepared, and not wanting another postponement by replacing him, I chose to represent myself pro se. During trial the Judge, Gloria Navarro, in open bias against the defense would not allow me to say the words “U.S. Constitution”, “1st Amendment Right”, “2nd Amendment Right”, “Right to keep and bear arms”, and in a moment of total frustration I asked her if I could say “freedom of speech” in her courtroom. She looked at me and said, “No, you may not.” When the defense got the case and attempted to call our first witness, the prosecution stated that all of our witnesses were “unindicted co-conspirators” and threatened to arrest and indict them if they testified. As a result, only two took the stand in our defense. Just prior to trial, it was discovered that SAC Dan Love had participated in some nefarious activities of which he was under investigation for and was ultimately relieved of duty. In a blow to the government’s case, they removed him as their star witness. No worries though as we would call him to the stand. When the defense attempted to call him, the government fought it and the judge ruled in their favor. The Special Agent in Charge of the entire operation and that agent whose Grand Jury testimony resulted in our indictments, would never take the stand. With Dan Love in a protected status and me completely discouraged at the ongoing conspiracy between the prosecutors and the judge, I asked a witness a single question about Dan Love and was immediately stripped of my pro se status and the ability to defend myself. My standby counsel took over but was completely clueless, knew nothing of the discovery, and continued to take his daily catnaps and e-bay shopping during the trial. As the trial came to a close, we were not allowed jury instructions of “selfdefense,” “defense of others,” or “justification” as the judge stated we were unable to prove the presence of BLM “intimidation,” “provocation,” “over aggressiveness,” or the presence of “snipers.” Our only defense would be, “we didn’t do it.” I was ultimately convicted of Count 12, “Obstruction of Justice” and Count 16, “Interstate Travel in Aid of Extortion.” Seven months later, during the third trial in which Cliven, Ryan, Ammon Bundy, and Ryan Payne were defendants, a bombshell memo was sent to the prosecution, the Department of Justice, and Congress. The memo was eighteen pages of outrageous conduct by the BLM, FBI, and USAO and was written by the government’s own lead investigator, Larry Wooten who investigated this incident for almost three years. Wooten stated that on February 17th, 2017, two weeks into my trial, A.U.S. A. Steven Myhre, the lead prosecutor, entered into a conspiracy with Wooten’s direct supervisor, Kent Kleman, to have Wooten removed from the investigation because they didn’t like his findings. All records of his investigation were confiscated from his office and he was told not to discuss the case with anyone. His investigation reports have never been found. This is a classic example of witness tampering and is a crime of “obstruction of justice” as Wooten was on the witness list for my trial. In the spring of 2018, Wooten wrote a second eighteen-page report memo that is so revealing of the governments’ corruption that the judge placed an exceptionally strict protective order on it and to date, it has not been released. In December of 2017, the judge declared a mistrial due to over three thousand pages of ‘Brady’ material (information likely beneficial to the defense) was finally turned over. The new ‘Brady’ material showed: ·         Five separate threat assessments that showed the Bundy’s were not a threat for violence. ·         The BLM’s threat assessment showed that (the BLM) were looking to “faceoff” and provoke the Bundy’s into a confrontation. ·         An FBI Operations Order in which the FBI had deployed snipers. ·         An aerial photograph showing the positions of at least two sniper teams perched above Cliven’s home on the nights of the 5th and 6th, prior to the arrival of protestors or militia. It also showed that the snipers had ranged the distance to his house, carried intermediate range rifles, night vision, thermal imaging devices, and infrared spotlights. ·         A six man Quick Reaction Force two miles away on stand-by prepared to assault the Bundy residence on the nights of the 5th and 6th. ·         The presence of live feed cameras above Bundy’s residence feeding real time video back to the ICP and Dan Love. ·         Evidence that Dan Love, pre-operation, gave a pep talk to his agents telling them to go out there and “kick Cliven in the teeth.” ·         Evidence that Dan Love sent an email telling his agents how to become “warriors.” ·         Evidence that Dan Love carried a “kill book” wherein he bragged about being responsible for three suicides in Operation Cerberus Action in Blanding, Utah. FBI Agent Joel Willis, according to the judge, “hid” exculpatory evidence in his agency vehicle. He stated that he “finally found a thumb drive”, after three years, “on the floor of his vehicle”. On January 8th, 2018, the judge dismissed the case “With Prejudice” against Cliven Bundy, Ryan Bundy, Ammon Bundy, and Ryan Payne due to “Flagrant Prosecutorial Misconduct, Due Process Violations, and multiple Brady Violations.” The government filed a motion asking Judge Navarro to reconsider her decision and on July, 3rd, 2018 she denied their motion and stated that the ‘Brady’ material withheld was at least relevant to Count 5, Count 12, and Count 16; two of the charges of which I was convicted. Shortly thereafter, the government dismissed all charges on the defendants that had not gone to trial yet. My luck for being in the first group! We filed a motion for a new trial due to the multiple ‘Brady’ violations revealing new evidence, a motion for a “Judgement of Acquittal” as the elements of the charges were never met, and a motion to depose Larry Wooten under oath in order to get his story on the record and add additional new evidence to the mountain that already existed. On the day of my sentence hearing, just minutes before going into the courtroom, Judge Navarro denied all three motions stating that the ‘Brady’ violations were not relevant to me and that the new evidence did not reach the threshold for a new trial and deposing Larry Wooten was “moot.” The government had stated, in the indictment, that there were NO government snipers at the Bundy Ranch and therefore Cliven’s assertion of snipers was “false, deceitful, and deceptive” and that his call to the militia for protection was an “unnecessary escalation of tensions.” At trial, I contentiously argued that snipers were present but was continually objected to by the government and sustained by the judge. We now know that as I argued at trial, the government had, in it’s possession, reams of evidence showing that from April 5th through April 12th, snipers were present and active at the Bundy Ranch. On July 19th, 2018, I was sentenced to fourteen years in Federal Prison. But I was not sentenced for Interstate Travel in Aid of Extortion or Obstruction of Justice but was sentenced for actual Extortion, Assault on a Federal Officer, Threatening a Federal Officer, and Use and Carry of a Firearm during a Crime of Violence; all of the charges I faced at trial but was not convicted. So why was it so important and why so much effort to remove Cliven Bundy from his land? It certainly was not delinquent grazing fees of $1.3 million, as a government attorney testified in the third trial that Mr. Bundy only owed $8800 in back fees. The answer is quite simple really and could have been found on the BLM’s own website before they removed it. During the impoundment, the website stated that the “Gold Butte Solar Project was not compatible with feral cattle.” There it was for the whole world to see and it had nothing to do with grazing fees. So who were the main players behind this massive land grab? Evidence shows that Senator Harry Reid’s son, Rory Reid, had formed a partnership and signed contracts with a Chinese solar company to install this solar project in Gold Butte. But they still needed Bundy and his cattle off the land. Harry Reid had a plan. He took one of his high level advisors, Neil Kornze, from his staff and had him moved over to the BLM. From 2009 to 2014, Kornze moved up the ranks until in April 2014 he became the Director of the BLM. To anchor this conspiracy and ensure he had the courts in his pocket, Harry Reid recommended to Barack Obama the appointment of none other than Gloria Navarro as Chief Justice for the District of Nevada. I tremble to think what the outcome of this rogue operation may have been had protestors, armed and unarmed, not heeded the call of this besieged rancher and converged on his ranch from across the country. Would Dan Love have killed this family and burned their house down around them as they assaulted them with snipers and armored vehicles? I thank the Lord that we will never know that answer. From inside a Birmingham, Alabama jail, Martin Luther King Jr. said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to Justice everywhere.” From inside a prison in Pahrump, Nevada, I couldn’t agree more. Electronic files of this note can be download here: PDF Document MS Word Document Doug Knowles | September 22, 2018 at 10:23 am | Categories: 9th Circuit, Bundy Ranch, Constitution, Editorial, Facebook, Freedom, Todd Engel | URL: https://wp.me/p8bCbd-1hL

Bunkerville Was Never About The Cows by Shari Dovale

New post on It Matters How You Stand

Bunkerville Was Never About The Cows by Shari Dovale Bunkerville Was Never About The Cows by Shari Dovale Bunkerville Standoff After seeing their God-given and Constitutionally-guaranteed rights being trampled on by the over-reaching Federal alphabet agencies, people across the nation rallied to defend the rights our country was founded on. (Pictured: Cliven Bundy walks by a first amendment area set up by the Bureau of Land Management near Bunkerville, Nev.) Videos on network news stations and around the internet depicted an elderly woman being thrown to the ground by law enforcement, a man being tazed repeatedly, and a “first amendment zone” set up miles away for protesters to stay out of the way of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). These citizens rightfully feared another Waco or Ruby Ridge encounter, and believed that citizens showing up in force, with cameras to record and witnesses to confirm, would reign-in the out-of-control government. The government came heavily armed with hundreds of officers. They carried military-grade weapons and dressed in Battle-ready uniforms. That side of the fence looked like a war zone from Afghanistan. The other side of the fence showed men, women, and children standing around under a highway overpass. Some had sidearms, as is legal in Nevada. Some had long guns, as is also legal in the state. Some carried protest signs, and still others rode on horseback. A few folks had questions as to whether the BLM had legal orders to remove Cliven Bundy’s cattle. Most did not care. They knew nothing about cows, or grazing rights, or ranching in the desert. They knew about the First Amendment, the Second Amendment and the other rights they saw were not available to these citizens. They came and they stood. They saw government weapons being pointed at them. They feared for their lives, yet they did not back down. They stood until the cows came home and the federal agents left the area. These people were successful. There were no shots fired that day. No one was hurt and everyone left within hours to return to their homes and their normal, everyday lives. Malheur Wildlife Refuge Fast forward 2 years. The government is still smarting from the citizens challenge of their behavior. They have not attempted to take the cows from Bundy again. They have let that go. But they still wanted their Day of Reckoning. In January 2016, Ammon Bundy, Cliven’s son, held a rally in Burns, Oregon to bring light to the gross injustice done to the ranching family of Dwight Hammond. Ammon tells the public he will take a “hard stand” at the Malheur Wildlife Refuge 30 miles outside of Burns, in the middle of nowhere. Dozens of people join Ammon to take adverse possession of the Refuge. The protesters are there for less than a month before the FBI executes an illegal ‘deadman’s roadblock‘ on a lonely highway. This results in the death of LaVoy Finicum, shot in the back by more government agents. It is learned later that these Federal agents lied about firing their weapons at Finicum. They also destroyed evidence at the scene of the crime. It was not until then that the Federal Government started arresting protesters. Dozens of people were arrested in connection to the Malheur protest as well as for the Bunkerville standoff. Most of the protesters have been incarcerated since then, over 18 months, without the chance for bail. LaVoy Finicum The Grand Jury Does anyone wonder about the timing of the arrests? Who is questioning why the government waited two years to arrest the protesters for Bunkerville? It is easily explained when you reason that the Federal government originally tried to indict all of the protesters, with special emphasis on the Bundy Family, under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Yes, they wanted to call this Rancher the head of an Organized Crime Family. However, they are not actually prosecuting them through the RICO Act. Why not? Special Agent in Charge Dan Love, on April 12, 2014 How many times did the Federal Government have to present this to the Grand Jury before they got some sort of indictments? I have a strong suspicion that the Grand Jury, in the beginning, did not roll over on this indictment any more than the trial jury did. How many bites at this apple did Myhre get? We do know that most of the evidence against them came from Special Agent in Charge Daniel P. Love. We can surmise that SAC Love built up the case of how scared he was and how dangerous the Bundy’s were, in order to get these indictments. Or can we? In actual fact, SAC Dan Love testified to the Grand Jury in October 2015, and stated these men were not a danger, and there was “no threat of violence or force prior to April 12, 2014”. Love testified, “The propensity for a violent encounter was low to nonexistent. There was nothing to suggest that there would be a violent encounter, no active intelligence beyond what we believed that we would see, you know, kind of the sagebrush rebellion tactics, people blockading vehicles, generally interfering, protesting, trying to impede.” This is what the BLM expected on April 12, 2014. This is what Ranger Alexandra Burke cried about on the witness stand. She was brought in as a sharpshooter, dressed in her ‘Battle-ready’ gear, and focused her weapons specifically to kill Eric Parker, yet she cried to the jury. (Facebook) The First Bunkerville Mistrial… and Retrial… and another Retrial? The trials of the Bunkerville Standoff have been held in Las Vegas, Nevada under the watch of Judge Gloria Navarro. Navarro has split 19 defendants into 3 tiers. Pete Santilli The first tier includes Cliven Bundy, his sons Ammon and Ryan, Ryan Payne, and journalist Pete Santilli. They have been called the ‘Leaders’ to this government challenge. The third tier of defendants, called the ‘least culpable’, were the men who carried the weapons on the bridge overlooking the wash. These included Todd Engel of Idaho, Greg Burleson of Arizona, Eric Parker of Idaho, Steven Stewart of Idaho, Rick Lovelein of Oklahoma, and O. Scott Drexler of Idaho. Each defendant was charged with 10 charges, including conspiracy charges and multiple gun charges that carried mandatory minimum sentencing requirements. The Tier 3 defendants went to trial first. Todd Engel The first trial earlier this year ended with Burleson convicted of 8 out of the 10 charges, Engel convicted of 2 out of 10 charges. With the mandatory minimum guidelines, Burleson was sentenced to 68 years in prison. Engel faces sentencing in September 2017. The jury did not reach a consensus as to any of the remaining charges in this trial and a mistrial was declared. This includes conspiracy charges. None of the defendants have been convicted of conspiracy charges. The government later decided not to retry Engel on the remaining charges. The Federal prosecutor, Acting US Attorney Steven Myhre, chose to retry the remaining 4 defendants from Tier 3. This trial resulted in 34 of the 40 charges to be Not Guilty and the remaining charges (against Parker and Drexler) to be deadlocked again. It was announced that the jury vote on the remaining charges were 11-1 in favor of acquittal. AUSA Myhre showed his anger the next day when asking for Parker and Drexler to continue their incarceration. He showed that the persecution of these men was a very personal thing. Why is this trial so personal to the government? Why is it so important that they obtain convictions for the “least culpable” defendants in the entire case? They have been tried by two different juries. Yet, AUSA Myhre is so invested in gaining some sort of conviction that it begs the question: WHY? Greg Burleson’s conviction almost does not count, as it is well considered that he was convicted of being a drunken braggart (thanks to the entrapment of the BLM) and convicted himself after the fact. Todd Engel was not convicted of any gun charges. Cliven Bundy However, Cliven Bundy is charged with gun charges. Bundy was not in the wash on April 12, 2014. Yet, the government will argue that Bundy began this conspiracy, therefore he is responsible for the bad acts of everyone else. Myhre needs a gun conviction on these other men to get a gun conviction on Cliven Bundy. Remember, the gun convictions carry mandatory minimum sentences in prison. If convicted of all gun charges in this case, Bundy would face 57 years for those crimes, plus any other sentence Navarro would deem fit to give him. Then there is the forfeiture clause. If convicted, the government would walk in and take the family ranch from Bundy’s wife, Carol, and the remaining members of his family. Judge Gloria Navarro Judge Navarro has been blatant in her bias against these defendants. She has aided the prosecution at every turn. She has not allowed the defense to present evidence of why the defendants went to Nevada, yet motive is key in the charges. She has stated that no citizen is allowed to defend themselves against the government, therefore, “self-defense” is not allowed in this case. Along with that, there cannot be “defense of others”. Additionally, she refuses to allow “provocation by the government” as evidence in this case. The defendants cannot mention the government snipers on the hill overlooking the protesters, with their high-powered rifles aimed at the people in the wash. Navarro has refused to allow mention of the first amendment zones set up by the BLM, as they will make the government “look bad”. She has ruled that no bad acts by the government will be allowed in this case. The US Constitution and the Bill of Rights are not allowed to be mentioned in front of the jury. The fact that Nevada is an “open carry” state is irrelevant to Judge Navarro. Defendant Parker was removed from the witness stand and not allowed to testify in his own defense. His crime? He said “I looked up and to the right.” Navarro has made it clear that these men are not to be allowed any defense. Yet… the jury still acquitted them. After two separate trials, the government has not been able to obtain convictions against these men. Even so, Steven Myhre, Gloria Navarro, and their superiors on up the chain, are determined to continue spending the taxpayer money and keep trying until they get a jury to go along with them. It is not about the cows. It is about putting a stop to any insurrection from the citizenry of these United States. As Oregon’s US Senator Ron Wyden would say, they need to stop the virus from spreading. The next trial will begin October 10th. This trial will include the two remaining defendants from Tier 3, Parker and Drexler, as well as all of the defendants from Tier 1. This week saw roughly a third of Idaho’s Legislators jointly ask Attorney General Jeff Sessions, as well as President Trump, to release the remaining defendants from further prosecution. The letter had been submitted to the Court prior to the pre-trial hearing, however, the decision had already been made to put Eric Parker and Scott Drexler in with the Tier One defendants.   Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews Shari Dovale | September 2, 2017 at 11:35 am | Categories: #GoogleDanLoveBLM, BLM, Bundy Ranch, Constitution, Court, FBI, Gold Butte, Harry Reid, III%, Land, LaVoy Finicum, Militia, News, Redoubt News | URL: http://wp.me/p8bCbd-TW

The FBI caught red-handed with bogus evidence against Pete Santilli

Deb Jordan posted: "12/28/2016  petesantillishow On March 2nd 2016 the federal government filed a Superseding Criminal Indictment (Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 27 Filed 03/02/16) naming radio talk show host Peter Santilli as a defendant.   The original" New post on It Matters How You Stand The FBI caught red-handed with bogus evidence against Pete Santilli by Deb Jordan 12/28/2016  petesantillishow On March 2nd 2016 the federal government filed a Superseding Criminal Indictment (Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 27 Filed 03/02/16) naming radio talk show host Peter Santilli as a defendant.   The original “Criminal Complaint” was signed off on February 11, 2016 by Joel P. Willis of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Since his arrest by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on January 26, 2016 in Burns, Oregon,  Santilli has discovered and documented that on numerous occasions, the FBI maliciously and intentionally fabricated evidence against him.  Pete Santilli is a journalist being held hostage by the Obama administration’s justice department; in fact, prosecutors have confirmed that Attorney General Loretta Lynch authorized Santilli’s arrest. In one instance in Oregon, the FBI fabricated a false report from Burns resident “Kevin Johnson” that Santilli was witnessed being present at a meeting planning the takeover of the Malheur Wildlife Refuge December 22nd 2015.  Pete Santilli possessed indisputable proof and documentation that he was in Cinncinati, Ohio on December 22nd.  Besides, when the erroneous FBI report was discovered, Kevin Johnson was immediately interviewed by Santilli’s investigator whereby Johnson denied making such a statement.    The FBI were caught red-handed with bogus evidence which they presented to the Grand Jury to indict him. Despite numerous attempts by the FBI to fabricate evidence and false narratives against Santilli, U.S. Government Prosecutors in Oregon finally began to realize, and privately acknowledged that the FBI may have intentionally given them bad information on Santilli.  There was no doubt that Santilli was innocent of all charges, and that the FBI may have had a vendetta against him due to Santilli’s relentless criticism of the FBI on his radio program. The high profile Oregon case was dismissed, and Santilli was quickly transported to the Nevada District where the FBI is known to be exponentially more corrupt. Pete Santilli’s legal team has been working very diligently for many months to uncover the same investigative corruption by the FBI in the Nevada case, as was discovered in the Oregon trial.  The evidence is clear, convincing and overwhelming.  In fact, the entire Nevada indictment against radio talk show host Pete Santilli is literally a fraudulent representation of the facts and events which occurred on or around April 12, 2014. The following is merely one example of how the FBI maliciously crafted an indictment for the Grand Jury in order to convince them that Santilli committed crimes related to the Bundy Ranch incident.  This is only one of approximately 16 indisputable examples of deceit perpetrated by the FBI.   BACKGROUND LEADING UP TO THE INTERVIEW WITH GARY FRANCHI On April 6th, an overwhelming number of heavily armed brown-shirt BLM agents harassed Bundy family members for expressing themselves outside of the “first amendment areas” setup by the federal government in the Bunkerville, Nevada region. Despite being told by the U.S. Attorney in Nevada that the BLM had “no arrest authority”, 15-20 BLM agents surrounded Cliven Bundy’s son Dave Bundy for parking on the shoulder of the Nevada state highway as he was observing and taking pictures with his iPad.  While snipers were trained on Bundy family members, Dave was taken to the ground; his face shoved into the gravel.  After 5 hours of parading him around like a trophy in handcuffs, he was finally transported to a Las Vegas jail.  Dave Bundy was never formally charged or arraigned for any crime and he was ultimately given a minorcitation and released into the streets of Las Vegas without a cell phone or dime in his pocket.  The Bundy family and supporters were incensed, and when news reports circulated, the public became extremely outraged. The “alternative” or independent media began covering the news story coming out of Nevada immediately after Dave Bundy’s brutal arrest and release without charges.  The small segment of the American population who have studied the WACO or Ruby Ridge incidents  immediately recognized early warning signs that the federal government’s escalation of their 20 year land-grabbing dispute with the Bundy family could possibly lead to the untimely deaths of the Bundy Family.  Leading up to the arrest of Dave Bundy on April 6th 2014 the federal government built a multi-million dollar impoundment site — a virtual military fortress staffed with hundreds of heavily armed BLM corporate mercenaries under the direction of the U.S. Department of Interior.   From the start of the impoundment, all of the right ingredients for disaster were incorporated into this crisis, and the BLM was stepping up their aggression daily. After a 2 hour live interview on The Pete Santilli Show with Cliven Bundy on April 8th 2014,  Pete Santilli  traveled to the Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville, Nevada to report on the alarming events taking place between the BLM and the Bundy family. On the morning of April 9, 2014, Santilli began to interview members of the Bundy Family who were actively protesting the BLM.  Additionally, Santilli was scheduled to begin reporting from the scene on the morning of Wednesday April 9th.  Two interviews were scheduled with Adam Kokesh (Adam vs The Man) and Gary Franchi (Next News Network). In an interview with Gary Franchi, Santilli provides an on scene report via Skype.  Please view the report and view the transcript below: 1 2 3 4 BREAKING: Feds prep for Waco style raid of Bundy Ranch Deb Jordan | December 28, 2016 at 12:13 pm | Categories: News | URL: http://wp.me/p8bCbd-8J