(My question about this is, Since the Holder Justice Dept. has placed US Constitutional law abiding patriots, Tea Party and other Conservative Normal American's, anyone who disagrees with the Obama regime's anti-American from of Change will be on their new terror list, I guess this includes them as potential targets of the Obama regime. PS. The White House has given access to Terrorist Groups, Muslim Brotherhood has an office there, they and others have access to our national security, military Intel, so will the White House now be targeted as the Obama Administration does support known terrorist groups with monies, guns, bombs, F-16's, Tanks, etc.??? Also keeping in mind, Obama requested / ordered 30,000 drones and 62 bases to fly them from to monitor the American People in America.)
Confidential Justice Department Memo: Drone Strikes on American Citizens With Suspected Terror Ties OK
[T]he confidential Justice Department “white paper” introduces a more expansive definition of self-defense or imminent attack than described by Brennan or Holder in their public speeches. It refers, for example, to what it calls a “broader concept of imminence” than actual intelligence about any ongoing plot against the U.S. homeland.Michael Isikoff, national investigative correspondent for NBC News, talks with Rachel Maddow about a newly obtained, confidential Department of Justice white paper that hints at the details of a secret White House memo that explains the legal justifications for targeted drone strikes that kill Americans without trial in the name of national security.“The condition that an operational leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the memo states.Instead, it says, an “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government may determine that the targeted American has been “recently” involved in “activities” posing a threat of a violent attack and “there is no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities.” The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.”
No comments:
Post a Comment