Thank you for visiting. My thoughts & Feelings are my Own.

Here I will share my feelings about America and her Future.

Let it be known to all the World, I love all Humankind, however the poor actions of the few that take away the Freedom's of the many wear on my soul. I don't hate them I feel sad for their foolishness before God and humankind.

Those leaders who seek to 'Keep their Oaths of office' and those who seek only self glory, power, tyranny and the destruction of America as it was founded, hoping to turn it into a Dictatorship, Marxist or other state of Tyranny.

For a long while I was unsure of putting a blog together with my thoughts on this, however Truth must be shared, if not to Awake American's to their dangerous situation then to record the folly of the ways of the wicked who do exist in the leadership of our Nation, States, Counties, Towns. Sad that I must add this page.

"We often search for things in life, yet seldom do we find.

Those things in life that really matter, until we make the time." S.T.Huls

God Bless the Republic of America!

We have Got To Stand Up!!

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents

72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered “Potential Terrorists” In Official Government Documents

(by Michael Snyder, The Truth Wins) -- Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner?  Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order?
Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)?  If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents.
At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly.  The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists.  But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens.  And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay.  So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke.  The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them.  And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.
Below is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.  To see the original source document for each point, just click on the link.  As you can see, this list covers most of the country…
1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
10. “Anti-Gay”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
13. “The Patriot Movement”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs” 
34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
58. “Rightwing extremists”
59. “Returning veterans”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
64. “Anti-abortion activists”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
72. Evangelical Christians
The groups of people in the list above are considered “problems” that need to be dealt with.  In some of the documents referenced above, members of the military are specifically warned not to have anything to do with such groups.
We are moving into a very dangerous time in American history.  You can now be considered a “potential terrorist” just because of your religious or political beliefs.  Free speech is becoming a thing of the past, and we are rapidly becoming an Orwellian society that is the exact opposite of what our founding fathers intended.
Please pray for the United States of America.  We definitely need it.

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

Mike Rowe Just Decimated The Freedom Socialist Party Of America! & Min Wage issues.

Breaking! Mike Rowe Just Decimated The Freedom Socialist Party Of America!

Posted 02/09/2015 5:50 pm by with 0 comments
Mike Rowe New Year's
Every red, white and blue blooded American who believes that everyone who is capable of working for a living should knows who Mike Rowe is. In recent years, he’s become a demigod among the working class and the guys at the top who started at the bottom of the ladder and climbed their way to the top.
Often, on the Mike Rowe Facebook Page, he’ll address comments sent in by his more than 2 million fans. This one, below, completely decimates the Socialists and their demands for a $20.00 an hour living wage. Make sure you read it all the way to the end so you see where they themselves only offer $13 an hour to their employees. Damn hypocrites!
Off The Wall
Hi Mike,
The federal minimum wage is $7.25 and hour. A lot of people think it should be raised to $10.10. Seattle now pays $15 an hour, and the The Freedom Socialist Party is demanding a $20 living wage for every working person. What do you think about the minimum wage? How much do you think a Big Mac will cost if McDonald’s had to pay all their employees $20 an hour?
Darrell Paul
Hi Darrell
Back in 1979, I was working as an usher for United Artists at a multiplex in Baltimore. The minimum wage was $2.90, and I earned every penny.
When I wasn’t tearing tickets in half and stopping kids from theater hopping, I was cleaning out the bathrooms, emptying the trash, and scrapping dubious substances off the theater floor with a putty knife. I wore a silly outfit and smiled unnaturally, usually for the entirety of my shift. I worked 18 hours my first week, mostly after school, and earned $62.20. Before taxes. But I was also learning the importance of “soft skills.” I learned to show up on time and tuck my shirt in. I embraced the many virtues of proper hygiene. Most of all, I learned how to take shit from the public, and suck up to my boss.
After three months, I got a raise, and wound up behind the concession stand. Once it was determined I wasn’t a thief, I was promoted to cashier. Three months later, I got another raise. Eventually, they taught me how to operate a projector, which was the job I wanted in the first place.
The films would arrive from Hollywood in giant boxes, thin and square, like the top of a card table, but heavy. I’d open each one with care, and place each spool on a separate platter. Then, I’d thread them into the giant projector, looping the leader through 22 separate gates, careful to touch only the sides. Raging Bull, Airplane, The Shining, Caddyshack, The Elephant Man – I saw them all from the shadowy comfort of the projection booth, and collected $10 an hour for my trouble. Eventually, I was offered an assistant manager position, which I declined. I wasn’t management material then, anymore than I am now. But I had a plan. I was going to be in the movies. Or, God forbid, on television.
I thought about all this last month when I saw “Boyhood” at a theater in San Francisco. I bought the tickets from a machine that took my credit card and spit out a piece of paper with a bar code on it. I walked inside, and fed the paper into another machine, which beeped twice, welcomed me in a mechanical voice, and lowered a steel bar that let me into the lobby. No usher, no cashier. I found the concession stand and bought a bushel of popcorn from another machine, and a gallon of Diet Coke that I poured myself. On the way out, I saw an actual employee, who turned out to be the manager. I asked him how much a projectionist was making these days, and he just laughed.
“There’s no such position,” he said. I just put the film in the slot myself and press a button. Easy breezy.”
To answer your question Darrell, I’m worried. From the business owners I’ve talked to, it seems clear that companies are responding to rising labor costs by embracing automation faster than ever. That’s eliminating thousands of low-paying, unskilled, entry level positions. What will that mean for those people trying to get started in the workforce? My job as an usher was the first rung on a long ladder of work that lead me to where I am today. But what if that rung wasn’t there? If the minimum wage in 1979 had been suddenly raised from $2.90 to $10 an hour, thousands of people would have applied for the same job. What chance would I have had, being seventeen years old with pimples and a big adams apple?
One night, thirty-six years ago, during the midnight showing of The Rocky Horror Picture Show, I sat in the projection booth and read a short story by Ray Bradbury called “A Sound of Thunder.” It was about a guy who traveled back in time to look at dinosaurs, but against strict orders, ventured off the observation platform and accidentally stepped on a butterfly. When he returned to the present, everything in the world had changed. “The Butterfly Effect” is now an expression that describes a single event that leads to a series of unanticipated outcomes, resulting in a profoundly unintended consequence. (Ironically, it’s also a movie with Ashton Kutcher, which I had to pay to see 30 years later.)
Anyway, I’m not an economist or a sociologist, but I’m pretty sure a $20 minimum wage would affect a lot more than the cost of a Big Mac. Beyond the elimination of many entry-level jobs, consider the effect on the skills gap. According to the BLS, they’re about three million available positions that companies are trying to fill right now. Very few of those jobs require a four-year degree, but nearly all require specific training. And all pay more than the current minimum wage. If we want a skilled workforce, (and believe me, we do,) should we really be demanding $20 an hour for unskilled labor?
Last year, I narrated a commercial about US manufacturing, paid for by Walmart. It started a shitstorm, and cost me many thousands virtual friends. Among the aggrieved, was a labor organization called Jobs With Justice. They wanted me to know just how unfairly Walmart was treating it’s employees. So they had their members send my foundation over 8,000 form letters, asking me to meet with unhappy Walmart workers, and join them in their fight against “bad jobs.”
While I’m sympathetic to employees who want to be paid fairly, I prefer to help on an individual basis. I’m also skeptical that a modest pay increase will make an unskilled worker less reliant upon an employer whom they affirmatively resent. I explained this to Jobs With Justice in an open letter, and invited anyone who felt mistreated to explore the many training opportunities and scholarships available through mikeroweWORKS. I further explained that I couldn’t couldn’t join them in their fight against “bad jobs,” because frankly, I don’t believe there is such a thing. My exact words were, “Some jobs pay better, some jobs smell better, and some jobs have no business being treated like careers. But work is never the enemy, regardless of the wage. Because somewhere between the job and the paycheck, there’s still a thing called opportunity, and that’s what people need to pursue.”
People are always surprised to learn that many of the subjects on Dirty Jobs were millionaires – entrepreneurs who crawled through a river of crap, prospered, and created jobs for others along the way. Men and women who started with nothing and built a going concern out of the dirt. I was talking last week with my old friend Richard, who owns a small but prosperous construction company in California. Richard still hangs drywall and sheetrock with his aging crew because he can’t find enough young people who want to learn the construction trades. Today, he’ll pay $40 an hour for a reliable welder, but more often than not, he can’t find one. Whenever I talk to Richard, and consider the number of millennials within 50 square miles of his office stocking shelves or slinging hash for the minimum wage, I can only shake my head.
Point is Darrell, if you fix the wage of a worker, or freeze the price of a thing, you’re probably gonna step on a few butterflies. Doesn’t matter how well-intended the policy – the true cost a $20 minimum wage has less to do with the price of a Big Mac, and more to do with a sound of thunder. Frankly, it scares the hell out of me.
PS I looked into the Freedom Socialist Party and their demand for a universal, $20 an hour living wage. Interesting. You’re right – they’re serious. But not long after they announced their position, they made the interesting decision to advertise for a web designer….at $13 an hour. Make of that what you will…
You may also enjoy:
ce 101


Sunday, February 22, 2015

Montanans fight to last drop over precious water rights

rain-water The American West’s history of conflict between Indians and settlers apparently isn’t over, as tribes in Montana are demanding title to water rights and lands that long have been privately owned.
The landowners, some of whom have had the land in their families for generations, fear they could end up with nothing, and they are fighting back.
A lawsuit filed last year claims the tribes “own all the land” and “all of the water” within their region.
The Concerned Citizens of Western Montana organization described the suit as a pressure tactic to try to force the state and other interested parties into approving a water agreement that now is pending before the legislature.
But whether it will work remains to be seen, and the Mountain States Legal Foundation has taken up defense of the claims.
“Our clients’ land was open for entry for 105 years, and in private hands for much of that time,” said William Perry Pendley, chief of the legal team. “The water rights appurtenant to those lands were owned fully by our clients and their predecessors for decades. We will vigorously defend those rights.”
To understand the significance of the battle, one needs to understand Western water rights and their importance.
Nothing can happen without water rights and the liquid gold that flows both east and west from the Continental Divide. In Colorado, there is even a separate water court system to address water rights.
If a newcomer buys land, say a $10 million parcel overlooking Aspen or Vail, and then spends $20 million on a house, it will remain vacant until and unless the owner obtains a fully approved well right for water.
Or the owner would have to build a system in which he would have the water delivered.
A Christian organization only about 20 miles from the Continental Divide has spent some $700,000 on legal fees trying to obtain permission to use water it already owned for its training location.
What has been proposed now in Montana is a Water Compact for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, a plan that has been negotiated with tribes and state and federal government interests over several years.
It would address several issues and resolve a number of cases launched by the tribes, but whether there will be agreement remains uncertain.
The two sides seem intractable.
State Sen. Debby Barrett, the state Senate’s president for the 64th legislative session, said there is no way she can support the proposed CSKT compact.
“The legislature’s role is to examine a proposed compact and decide whether or not to enact it into Montana law. The legislature’s responsibility and authority includes amending proposals if necessary, and approving all state costs associated with a compact such as this one. (The price tag of the state’s share on the CSKT compact is $55 million today.) But at an informational meeting held by proponents, the legislature was warned that it cannot amend the proposal. It’s a ‘take it or leave it’ deal,” she wrote in a published commentary.
“That insult to the constitutional role of the legislature is enough for me to want to leave it. Other proposed compacts have not been thrust on us, the legislature, with such arrogance and disrespect for legislators,” she said.
But in an opposing opinion, John Youngberg of the Montana Farm Bureau Federation said the deal is nothing more than an “equitable division and apportionment of water rights between the state and its people and the Indian tribes.”
His commentary explained: “It protects the water rights of farmers and ranchers. If there is not a negotiated agreement, the tribe is required by state law to file and litigate their claims for instream flow rights on all water as far east as the Milk River, the upper Musselshell, the Upper Missouri and Upper Yellowstone.
“This would require all current water rights holders on those streams and tributaries to defend their rights against an 1855 right (the year the treaty was signed).”
The treaty he referenced is the Treaty of Hellgate, ratified March 8, 1859, during the administration of President James Buchanan.
Under the treaty, the “confederated tribes of Indians hereby cede, relinquish, and convey to the United States all their right, title, and interest in and to the country occupied or claimed by them,” within designated boundaries.
But reserved “for the use and occupation of the said confederated tribes” is a reservation, again within certain boundaries.
Rights of way were retained for roads, and Indians were given the “exclusive right of taking fish in all the streams running through or bordering said reservation.” The right was described as “in common” with other state residents.
The tribes were given $120,000 for the land, and the government promised to furnish a school, a teacher, a blacksmith shop, a gun shop, a carpenter’s shop, a wagon shop and to employ operators.
A sawmill and flour mill were added to the bargain.
The Indians in return promised not to make war on the U.S. and to allow land to be “surveyed into lots” assigned to “individuals.”
Barrett explained that there are a number of concerns for her and others.
The 2013 legislature refused to ratify the agreement “for many good reasons concerning its legality and equal treatment of this state’s citizens, both on and off the reservation,” she said.
“Now, it has been reintroduced, but not much changed or improved.
“These failures include more than a dozen permanent surrenders of the legislature’s authority over water in Montana, allowing the CSKT to choose whether to obey legislative enactments or not and giving them complete immunity from compliance with important aspects of Montana water and environmental law, including the Montana Environmental Policy Act. It also requires the state to give partial ownership of some of its water rights and its contracts for water to the CSKT and to manage those assets for the tribes’ benefit, rather than all citizens of the state.”
She continued, “It gives the CSKT the water right to 110,000 acres of irrigated land owned by individuals, whose irrigation districts have filed on that same water right.”
As a rancher and a senator “who values little ahead of private property rights, I think I know when to call a bluff, and when to stand my ground no matter what,” Barrett said.
“This is such a time.”
Former Montana lawmaker Elaine Willman called the plan “the Revolutionary War for citizens of Montana.”
The water, she said, is just the start.
“There will be more: Kerr Dam, the Columbia River Treaty, threats of the CSKT initializing ‘repatriation’ of their entire reservation, forcing non-tribal members off of their properties.”
She wrote in a commentary: “Does this sound over the top? It is not. A small tribe of some 5,000 members led by aggressive, hostile leadership emboldened by every available federal agency and resource is in full assault mode to remove state authority within the reservation boundary, and likely within 11 western counties. ”
Willman said “the governor, attorney general, and apparently the majority of Montana’s Legislature are ignoring two major U.S. Supreme Court rulings, along with the Montana State Constitution, and have intentionally turned their backs on Montana citizens.”
“In OHA v. Hawaii (2009) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that land may not be removed from a state’s authority, jurisdiction or tax base without approval of the state legislature. In Tarrant v. Herrmann (2013) the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states have ‘the absolute right and authority over all navigable waters and the soils beneath them for lands ceded to a state upon statehood.’”
The citizen’s group, Concerned Citizens of Western Montana, noted a state judge already has found there would be problems with the “takings” in the compact, because they would be “without compensation.”
The group also noted that the tribes were paid $4.4 million in 1966 for land the tribal members gave up in the 1800s and then another $21.6 million in 1971 for various lands held in private hands on the reservation.
The Hellgate Treaty also provided, the group said, “for the sale of surplus lands after allotment pursuant to the laws of the Congress.”


Saturday, February 21, 2015

Seeking the bare minimal

sample copy of the book from printer

I am trying another crowd funding service in order to get the new basic funds needed to get this project started. With the new publishing services etc. the bare minimum is $1,000

I believe in Capitalism, those who have it making it available to those who are need more to get their own dreams to become a reality.
Then once success has happened it allows the new successful people to turn around and pass along their capital to the next dreamers and assist them in funding and the opportunity to achieve their dreams.

I am not looking for a hand out, but a hand up. And willing to barter / trade what I am able to at this time.

The link has more about that:

Twin Lakes Book 1 PHG series

Author seeking help,

I am working to raise minimal funds to publish this book. The only thing standing in the way at this time is funds. It has taken a long time to get this far, and have been saving what few dollars per pay check along the way to help.

Those who can donate $10.00 will get a free E-Book.
Those who can donate $25.00 will get a free Printed book sent to you.
Those who can donate $50.00 will have a signed copy of the printed book and e-book sent to you.

Those who donate $5.00 or more will have the option if you want to be placed on a thank you page in both versions of the book for making this 1st book of the Pure Heart Guide series possible to share with the world.

This is all I am able to do as far as thank you's in helping this process along as I am limited in resources. (Additional postage may be required to mail your printed book based upon you location on the Earth) 

My career job of 21+yrs is as a Drywall Finisher. I have a wonderful wife and 5 children and our 1st grandson.

Through normal life's trials, 2 children surviving cancers, and other drama we finally are to this stage. (If I told you the last 24yrs experiences no one would believe it, I find many have such interesting lives.)

So someone suggested this program.
I prefer to do things on my own and being as self reliant as I can. But the publishing world is hard to break into. So after years of research I have chosen a self publisher who is successful with E-Books, Printed, and now offers print on demand. The asking goal is to cover those fee's and some advertising.

The book is what it is, I have the history and samples from it on Face Book,  
This one is set up for this project and links to a website where the fuller story of this adventure is below.

Official Web "Pure Heart Guide" Book Series.

I have been told by the pre publishing readers its a good story, and unique.That was the goal.
There will be 5 books in the Pure Heart Guide series.
Book One "Twin Lakes" is done, cover art as well.
With these funds I will have some help adjusting some things with the covers and then publish it.

About the book:

Pure Heart Guide is a book series that starts in the Beaver Utah area, a family goes on a reunion to remote twin lakes. The kids find a door & cave, several disappear a search begins and then strange and dangerous things take place leading the rescue party into mysterious underground places. Intrigue, betrayals, faith and how the family and friends deal with the trials before them, an old friend assists in the search as a guide for where they are going he has been before.
Choices must be made for good or bad and with each choice made the ripple effects will change how the world and humanity looks at themselves and others they did not know existed, until now.
This is an adventure filled with twists and turns, and faith, prayer, mystery, discovery. Epic fight between the 2 forces of eternity, Good vs. Evil, Light vs Darkness, who will win in the end and how will it effect your life?

The Fundamental Changing of America.

 The Fundamental Changing of America.

The Fundamental Changing of America. This did not start with Obama and his Anti American followers. This started a hundred years ago with the progressives, communists, statists, atheist, marxists and the like.
Let’s just start with the Government takeover of the education systems of America. Pres. Jimmy Carter successfully with his helpers took over American schools when they placed in power the NEA, National Education Association. (this was founded in the early 1900’s by a Leninist group from Russia to destroy the USA education system and began in our universities) What has happened since the 1970s NEA being placed in power. God is no longer allowed in schools (prior it was required to teach the ethics of the Holy Bible in schools or you could NOT become a State in the Union) Morality and civility has plummeted, degraded, self-centeredness  and immorality on all levels has become the new normal not 30yrs after the NEA took control. The worlds #1 Schools have now gone to the bottom of the list.
They demand more Tax Monies to Fix the schools, trillions have been spent and our students are worse off than before Carter put this NEA in charge. Schools are indoctrination zones now. Schools take the free cheese of Federal funds for spending as they please now today they are Slaves to the Fed NEA handouts (cheese) they are forced to indoctrinate or no more free cheese. They label children as Special ed or add / adhd in order to gain MORE Fed Cheese/Cash for their school districts that have become a Business. Children who are normal are labeled by non drs in order to create a huge income flow for the schools. I know I have seen it from Oregon, North Utah and even Sevier County.
My kids were affected. My daughter now on Utah’s computer school at home at her request is now vastly improving her skills and education, At school she was labeled special ed (for the bucks or due to? reasons) She wanted to Learn not deal with the nonsense happening so we tested it and she will continue this program.
Obama ACA Care like the NEA with do the opposite and destroy the healthcare system that was once #1, but due to FDA, Lawyers, Corruption, federal controls has destroyed the #1 system now those who created this crisis come in with a fix? Really? The way marxists work is they make the crisis, and never truly fix it. Fixing is not the goal. When you see a nice sounding program like ACA, not affordable for most, NEA not designed to help students but to indoctrinate and worse, Planned Parenthood nice sounding but should be in reality planned extermination of humanity starting with Blacks as Margret Sanger a Founder Goals was.
The worse words you can hear is I am from the Government and I am here to help you.
The EPA, BLM, IRS, NSA, NEA, etc are all part of they system and now infiltrated by Muslim brotherhood and other terrorist organizations also by radical marxists / communists some who have been in office and power over 30yrs. They seek our Fundamental change. To a tyranny Government.
Programs designed to help poor blacks over the last 60yrs and to place them and other manorities 1st in line for jobs and school and higher education has backfired and created more poverty and suffering and crime and split families than ever before in American history. Thus creating more chaos and crisis’s for the Gov to fix. Which they never do.
Obama has openly for years told you he was a Muslim, that he would defend and protect his muslim buddies at all costs. Today does it not surprise you now that no more elections are coming for him, that he is openly telling YOU to accept Islam, to try and understand their point of view, that terrorists are not really muslims, that they just need empathy and jobs. He has placed in power and authority these radical terrorists and their sympathizers over you. They choose what is a terrorist group. The wolf gets to choose who the enemy of America is folks under Obama and the list is this. Not known terror groups who are at this time enjoying a New Holocaust against Christians and Jews and those they feel are not true followers of Allah. They are raped, enslaved, slaughtered in the most evil ways imaginable, organs harvested from awake and alive Christians to sell on the organ markets of the world. That’s the nice things they do in the name of Allah.
You have God / Christian / Jewish NOT Allowed by laws of modern radicals from the 1960’s to be taught in schools or Government entities even our military is under Anti-Christian attacks. Meanwhile Islam is 100% endorsed and promoted, and taught now in our Government schools and military and all levels of government. You must allow it, this is the growing national religion as Obama and his muslim allies desire. This is unconstitutional, the promotion of 1 religion by Government. So much for the radicals agenda of separation of church and state, it was the separation of the Holy Bibles Judeao / Christians that has been prohibited by these radical anti-God people. Now they endorse Allah.
You see your nation is under attack on all levels, if you are Christian then live it, and teach it to your children. Same if your Jew or whatever faith. However teach the 10 commandments as they are the fundamental basis for all civilized societies worldwide, when they are removed you get lucifers chaos every time. 

There is a WAR it is between good and evil, light and darkness. Look to the real fruits of their ideologies.
Christianity and Jewish ideology have for the 90% of the time been good. Unless those wolves in sheeps clothing have entered in and claimed to be followers of Christ only to be the opposite.
Islams ideology from the start was more of a death cult, follow and join or die. All forms of Anti civilization are not only condoned but promoted. All forms of Evil that the God of Earth – Jesus Christ has prohibited are promoted under islam.  You see the difference of their fruits?
Today millions have been slaughtered and enslaved under Allah, could allah be Lucifer they seem to have the same goals.

Time is to choose who you will stand with, who you serve and whom you will follow. What will you do when the corrupt ideologies of the New AmeriKa under Obama and his minions and even the world will come and demand your allegiance or your life. 

You see Obama also has packs with Russia’s Putin, to create chaos and allow them to do whatever they desire, to feign anger and send a small amount of our best to be killed by them. But to assist them in their new agendas of taking Europe under the New USSR system Putin is growing. Obama's helpers have been caught on open mic stating such help after his election. It is happening.
The world is in chaos, planned chaos. America will follow. Know God, know your constitutional  rights and laws, and be Oath keepers. Not oath breakers and part of the growing cancer of evil. Stand for your family, for your God for your children’s futures and for your Constitutional Republic or become the slaves and corpses of the future. 

Saturday, February 14, 2015

A French Soldier's View of US Soldiers in Afghanistan

A French Soldier's View of US Soldiers in Afghanistan

What follows is an account from a French ISAF soldier that was
stationed with American Warfighters in Afghanistan sometime in the past 6
years.  This was copied and translated from an editorial French


"We have shared our daily life with two US units for quite a while -
they are the first and fourth companies of a prestigious infantry
battalion whose name I will withhold for the sake of military secrecy.
To the common man it is a unit just like any other. But we live with
them and got to know them, and we henceforth know that we have the honor
to live with one of the most renowned units of the US Army - one that
the movies brought to the public as series showing "ordinary soldiers
thrust into extraordinary events". Who are they, those soldiers from
abroad, how is their daily life, and what support do they bring to the
men of our OMLT every day? Few of them belong to the Easy Company, the
one the TV series focuses on. This one nowadays is named Echo Company,
and it has become the support company. 

They have a terribly strong American accent - from our point of view
the language they speak is not even English. How many times did I have
to write down what I wanted to say rather than waste precious minutes
trying various pronunciations of a seemingly common word? Whatever State
they are from, no two accents are alike and they even admit that in
some crisis situations they have difficulties understanding each other.
Heavily built, fed at the earliest age with Gatorade, proteins and
creatine- they are all heads and shoulders taller than us and their
muscles remind us of Rambo. Our frames are amusingly skinny to them - we
are wimps, even the strongest of us - and because of that they often
mistake us for Afghans.

And they
are impressive warriors! We have not come across bad ones, as strange at
it may seem to you when you know how critical French people can be.
Even if some of them are a bit on the heavy side, all of them provide us
everyday with lessons in infantry know-how. Beyond the wearing of a
combat kit that never seem to discomfort them (helmet strap, helmet,
combat goggles, rifles etc.) the long hours of watch at the outpost
never seem to annoy them in the slightest. On the one square meter
wooden tower above the perimeter wall they stand the five consecutive
hours in full battle rattle and night vision goggles on top, their sight
unmoving in the directions of likely danger. No distractions, no
pauses, they are like statues nights and days. At night, all movements
are performed in the dark - only a handful of subdued red lights
indicate the occasional presence of a soldier on the move. Same with the
vehicles whose lights are covered - everything happens in pitch dark
even filling the fuel tanks with the Japy pump.
Here we discover
America as it is often depicted: their values are taken to their
paroxysm, often amplified by promiscuity and the loneliness of this
outpost in the middle of that Afghan valley.

combat? If you have seen Rambo you have seen it all - always coming to
the rescue when one of our teams gets in trouble, and always in the
shortest delay. That is one of their tricks: they switch from T-shirt
and sandals to combat ready in three minutes. Arriving in contact with
the enemy, the way they fight is simple and disconcerting: they just
charge! They disembark and assault in stride, they bomb first and ask
questions later - which cuts any pussyfooting short.
motherland - everything here reminds of that: the American flag floating
in the wind above the outpost, just like the one on the post parcels.
Even if recruits often originate from the hearth of American cities and
gang territory, no one here has any goal other than to hold high and
proud the star spangled banner. Each man knows he can count on the
support of a whole people who provides them through the mail all that an
American could miss in such a remote front-line location: books,
chewing gums, razorblades, Gatorade, toothpaste etc. in such way that
every man is aware of how much the American people backs him in his
difficult mission. And that is a first shock to our preconceptions: the
American soldier is no individualist. The team, the group, the combat
team are the focus of all his attention.

(This is the main area where I'd like to
comment. Anyone with a passing knowledge of Kipling knows the lines from
Chant Pagan: 'If your officer's dead and the sergeants look
white/remember it's ruin to run from a fight./ So take open order, lie
down, sit tight/ And wait for supports like a soldier./ This, in fact,
is the basic philosophy of both British and Continental soldiers. 'In
the absence of orders, take a defensive position.' Indeed, virtually
every army in the world. The American soldier and Marine, however, are
imbued from early in their training with the ethos: In the Absence of
Orders: Attack! Where other forces, for good or ill, will wait for
precise orders and plans to respond to an attack or any other
'incident', the American force will simply go, counting on firepower and
SOP to carry the day.

This is one of the great strengths of the American force in combat
and it is something that even our closest allies, such as the Brits and
Aussies (that latter being closer by the way) find repeatedly
surprising. No wonder is surprises the hell out of our enemies.)

We seldom hear any harsh word, and from 5 AM onwards the camp chores
are performed in beautiful order and always with excellent spirit. A
passing American helicopter stops near a stranded vehicle just to check
that everything is alright; an American combat team will rush to support
ours before even knowing how dangerous the mission is - from what we
have been given to witness, the American soldier is a beautiful and
worthy heir to those who liberated France and Europe.

To those who bestow us with the honor of sharing their combat
outposts and who everyday give proof of their military excellence, to
those who pay the daily tribute of America's army's deployment on Afghan
soil, to those we owned this article, ourselves hoping that we will
always remain worthy of them and to always continue hearing them say
that we are all the same band of brothers".

Personal Thoughts About the Article:

For much of this article, the various veterans reading will go 'Well,
duh. Of course we do our 'camp chores' and stand our posts in good
order. There's a reason for them and if we didn't we'd get our heads
handed to us eventually. And, yeah, we're in shape. Makes battle easier.
The more you sweat, the less you bleed.'

What is hard for most people to comprehend is that that attitude
represented only the most elite units of the past. Current everyday
conventional boring 'leg infantry' units exceed the PT levels and
training levels of most Special Forces during the Vietnam War. They
exceed both of those as well as IQ and educational levels of: Waffen SS,
WWII Rangers, WWII Airborne and British 'Commando' units during WWII.
Their per-unit combat-functionality is essentially unmeasurable because
it has to be compared to something and there's nothing comparable in
industrial period combat history.

This group is so much better than 'The Greatest Generation' at war
that WWII vets who really get a close look at how good these kids are
stand in absolute awe.

complains about the quality of 'the new guys.' Don't. The screw-ups of
this modern generation are head and shoulders above the 'high-medium' of
any past group. Including mine.
So much of 'The scum of the earth, enlisted for drink.'

This is 'The Greatest Generation' of soldiers.

They may never be equaled.

Original Article in French HERE

★ U.S. Armed Forces - We Must Fight - President Reagan (HD) 2014 ★

Monday, February 9, 2015

Ex-CIA Employee Admits President Obama is a “radical Islamic” Enemy of America

Ex-CIA Employee Admits President Obama is a “radical Islamic” Enemy of America

Radical” is such a ridiculous adjective. It is pure Islam, authentic Islam — there is nothing radical or un-Islamic about jihad.

Obama’s father was a Muslim, which de facto makes him a Muslim, and he is considered Muslim in the Muslim world. Take, for example, Meriam Ibrahim. Her mother was Christian and raised her a Christian. She married a Christian, lives in America and has Christian children. But when she returned to Sudan to visit family, she was arrested for “apostasy” — in other words, for leaving Islam. She was nine months pregnant and forced to give birth with her legs shackled, leaving her baby deformed. This is Islamic law. She is considered a Muslim even though she has never been a Muslim, because her father was a Muslim.
Obama, on the other hand, was raised a Muslim, and went to Islamic school in an Islamic country (Indonesia) from the ages of six to eleven. He was tops in his quran class.
Obama was “previously quite religious in Islam.”
He is pro-jihad and it is clear in his foreign policy.
There’s a reason he attacks and punishes Israel while allowing the Islamic State to grow and conquer.
It’s interesting that the Examiner is actually running this story. They won’t run my columns or any of the articles I have submitted to them over the years. Don’t you love these right of center publications and bloggers (like Michelle Malkin) who have shunned my work and Robert Spencer’s, but when jihad breaks out they are all jihad-wild. The National Review actually has a ban on scholar Robert Spencer. Shame on them and all the other imposters who are writing about this now without the proper mea culpas.
It’s an explosive charge, one that practically accuses the president of treason.
Today, a former CIA agent bluntly told the newspaper, World Net Daily, that America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama. Clare Lopez was willing to say what a few members of Congress have said in private, but declined to say on-the-record.
Clare M. Lopez is the Vice President for Research and Analysis at the Center for Security Policy and a Senior Fellow at The Clarion Project, the London Center for Policy Research, and the Canadian Meighen Institute. Since 2013, she has served as a member of the Citizens Commission on Benghazi. Also Vice President of the Intelligence Summit, she formerly was a career operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency, a professor at the Centre for Counterintelligence and Security Studies, Executive Director of the Iran Policy Committee from 2005-2006, and has served as a consultant, intelligence analyst, and researcher for a variety of defense firms. She was named a Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute in 2011.
Lopez said the global war on terror had been an effort to “stay free of Shariah,” or repressive Islamic law, until the Obama administration began siding with such jihadist groups as the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates. Lopez believes that the Muslim Brotherhood has thoroughly infiltrated the Obama administration and other branches of the federal government. One of the most outrageous of those appointments is Mohamed Elibiary, a senior member of the Department of Homeland Security Advisory Council. According to a report by the Center for Security Policy, Elibiary supports brokering a U.S. partnership with the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group. Two months ago, a firestorm erupted online after Elibiary tweeted that a “Caliphate” is inevitable and compared it to the European Union.
Ms. Lopez also believes Obama had essentially the same goals in the Mideast as the late Osama bin Laden: “to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands.” The former CIA operative’s perspective affects her prescription for what the U.S. should do about the terror army ISIS, as she called for caution and restraint.
While there has been a sudden chorus of politicians and military experts calling for the immediate elimination of the terrorist army after it beheaded American journalist James Foley last week, Lopez believes the U.S. should have an overall strategy in place before fully re-engaging in the Mideast militarily.Any military action would be further complicated, she told WND, if it were not clear which side the U.S. is on, either in the short term or in the overall war on terror.
Lopez felt it was impossible to understand why the president and some of his top appointees, such as CIA Director John Brennan, who is believed to be a Muslim convert, “consistently seem to apologize for Islam, even in the face of such atrocities as the Foley beheading,” adding, they “take pains to assure the world they don’t think IS, (or the Islamic State, also called ISIS) or whichever perpetrator it was, has anything to do with Islam. How can they possibly believe that genuinely when everything these jihadis do tracks directly to the literal text of Quran, hadiths and Shariah?”
“In any case, and for whatever motivations, there is no doubt this administration switched sides in what used to be called the Global War on Terror,” she said.
I wonder if those who don’t want to go ‘on the record’ will finally speak out.
Courtesy of Pamela Geller.

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.