data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10729/1072971c093c5cb34857ed6d1f128fe999b63e99" alt="Gina McCarthy testifies before a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on her nomination to be administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency on Capitol Hill in Washington April 11, 2013. (REUTERS/Joshua Roberts) Gina McCarthy testifies before a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on her nomination to be administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency on Capitol Hill in Washington April 11, 2013. (REUTERS/Joshua Roberts)"
EPA Chief Promises To Go After Republicans Who Question Agency Science
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1905f/1905fa9585d7deeb5e4e420ef4c50b22495883e5" alt=""
“Those critics conjure up claims of EPA secret science — but it’s not really about EPA science or secrets. It’s about challenging the credibility of world renowned scientists and institutions like Harvard University and the American Cancer Society,” McCarthy said, according to Politico.
“It’s about claiming that research is secret if researchers protect confidential personal health data from those who are not qualified to analyze it — and won’t agree to protect it,” she added. “If EPA is being accused of secret science because we rely on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1905f/1905fa9585d7deeb5e4e420ef4c50b22495883e5" alt=""
Republicans Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana and Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas have led the charge on pressing the EPA to make publicly available the scientific data behind its clean air regulations. McCarthy promised she would make such data publicly available during her confirmation process last year. Now her refusal to cough up the data has angered Republicans.
“EPA’s leadership is willfully ignoring the big picture
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1905f/1905fa9585d7deeb5e4e420ef4c50b22495883e5" alt=""
“We’re not asking, and we’ve never asked, for personal health information, and it is inexcusable for EPA to justify billions of dollars of economically significant regulations on science that is kept hidden from independent reanalysis and congressional oversight,” Vitter added.
The EPA has used non-public data to justify 85 percent of $2 trillion worth of Clean Air Act regulation benefits
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1905f/1905fa9585d7deeb5e4e420ef4c50b22495883e5" alt=""
House Republicans have backed a bill that would block the EPA from crafting regulations based on “secret” data
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1905f/1905fa9585d7deeb5e4e420ef4c50b22495883e5" alt=""
That soot rule is supposed to yield $4 billion to $9 billion in benefits per year, while costing from $50 million to $350 million, but the data backing that claim up is not publicly available.
“For far too long, the EPA has approved regulations that have placed a crippling financial
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1905f/1905fa9585d7deeb5e4e420ef4c50b22495883e5" alt=""
“Virtually every regulation proposed by the Obama administration has been justified by nontransparent data and unverifiable claims,” said Smith, who cosponsored the bill. “The American people foot the bill for EPA’s costly regulations, and they have a right to see the underlying science. Costly environmental regulations should be based on publicly available data so that independent scientists can verify the EPA’s claims.”
Follow Michael on Twitter and Facebook
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/28/epa-chief-promises-to-go-after-republicans-who-question-agency-science/2/#ixzz30HBqaOMJ
No comments:
Post a Comment